📈 INTU Price Movement Analysis Report for Retail Investors
🏢 Company Overview
Intuit Inc. | Sector: Technology | Industry: Software – Application
This report provides a simplified overview of the adaptive price movement analysis for INTU. Using historical price data up to 2025-12-03, it identifies stock-specific trading zones based on distances from 1-month highs, tailored to INTU’s unique behavior. The analysis accounts for volatility relative to the S&P 500, recent price patterns, and broader market trends. This is not financial advice—always conduct your own research and consult a professional advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
📊 Key Data Points
- Symbol: INTU
- Analysis Date: 2025-12-03
- Current Price: $647.68
- 1-Month High: $682.27 (reached on 2025-11-21 00:00:00)
- Distance from High: 5.1%
📈 Price Trajectory (Multi-Timeframe Analysis)
- Short-term (5 days): Mild rally (+2.9% in 5 days)
- Medium-term (3 months): Sideways / Range-bound (-1.3% in 3 months)
- Long-term (12 months): Sideways (+2.1% in 12 months)
Interpretation: The short-term shows immediate momentum from 2025-11-26 00:00:00 to 2025-12-03, while medium and long-term trends reveal the broader price structure. Current overall direction: MIXED at NORMAL pace.
📊 RSI Momentum Indicator (RFC-008 Phase 2)
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) measures momentum on a 0-100 scale using 14-period Wilder’s smoothing. Values above 70 indicate overbought conditions (potential pullback), while values below 30 suggest oversold conditions (potential bounce).
Current RSI Status
🟢 Neutral Zone
| Metric | Value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14-day) | 48.4 | Neutral |
| Signal | 🟢 Neutral | RSI at 48.4 – no extreme conditions, normal market activity |
Trading Implication: RSI between 30-70 indicates normal market conditions for INTU without extreme momentum. This is:
– Ideal for swing trading setups using price zones
– Less likely to experience immediate reversals
– Good time to wait for clear directional signals
Strategy: Focus on price zone positions and volume confirmation rather than momentum extremes.
Methodology: Classic Wilder’s smoothing algorithm – first period uses simple average of 14-day gains/losses, subsequent periods apply exponential smoothing (prior_avg × 13 + current) / 14 for momentum continuity.
⏱️ Microstructure Timing Signals (Last 10 Candles (Nov 19 – Dec 03, 2025))
⚠️ Confluence Score: 2/4 (moderate_microstructure_edge)
| Signal | Status | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 🔵 Range Compression | Normal | 0.000 |
| 🔵 Volume Activity | Normal | 0.000 |
| 🔵 Wick Patterns | 3 upper rejections vs 1 lower absorptions – selling pressure at highs | 3 rejections / 1 absorptions |
| 🔵 Candlestick Patterns | Pattern cluster: indecision patterns (doji/spinning tops) | 3 patterns |
Battle Dynamics: The confluence score of 2/4 suggests a moderate microstructure edge, indicating this is not a high-conviction setup. The current intraday chop and lack of range compression imply limited directional momentum, making it prudent to approach with caution.
Timing: Moderate edge present. Monitor for additional signal convergence before acting (3-7 days).
Pattern Formation Timeline
Candlestick Patterns Detected:
– 🟢 Hammer: Dec 02 (bullish reversal signals)
– 🔵 Spinning Top: Nov 19, Nov 25 (indecision)
Wick Events:
– ⬆️ Upper Rejections: Nov 19, Nov 21, Dec 01 (selling pressure)
– ⬇️ Lower Absorptions: Dec 02 (buying support)
Microstructure analysis examines the last 10 candles (Nov 19 – Dec 03, 2025) for timing signals.
📉 Volatility and Market Context
INTU’s price movements are classified as “High (Growth stocks, small-caps)” with an annualized volatility of 33.9% and a typical daily price swing of 2.14% ($13.86). This means INTU can move about 2.14% daily, which is high compared to other stocks.
- 🎯 Relative Volatility: INTU’s current volatility ranks in the 68.0th percentile compared to the historical volatility of the S&P 500 (SPY). This means INTU’s price swings are larger than those of the broader market on 68.0% of historical trading days, indicating typical market risk.
- 🌍 Market Environment: The analysis identifies a neutral market, with the S&P 500 (SPY) trading at $683.89, 1.8% above its 50-day moving average ($671.48). Bear markets increase selling pressure, requiring wider safety margins.
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| 📊 Stock Volatility | 33.9% (annualized) | Yearly price fluctuations; higher means more risk/reward |
| 📅 Daily Volatility (σ) | 2.14% ($13.86) | Typical 1-day move (std deviation) for context |
| 🎯 Volatility vs. SPY | 68.0th percentile | typical market risk |
| 📈 Market Trend | neutral (1.8% vs. SMA50) | Challenging market conditions; zones are wider to account for higher risk. |
| ⚖️ Current Setup R/R | 1.14:1 | Risk/Reward entering at current price (see RFC-008 section) |
🎯 Price-Based Trading Zones
This analysis uses INTU’s historical price patterns to define trading zones based on percentage distances from its 1-month high ($682.27). These zones are adjusted for INTU’s high volatility (widened for larger swings), recent price behavior (emphasizing data from the last ~3.4 years), and the neutral market environment (wider near-high zones). The zones are based on 55 historical reversal points (21 resistance, 34 support), with recent patterns weighted more heavily (average weight: 0.11).
| Zone | Distance (%) | Price Level | Trading Insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Resistance | 1.0 | $675.45 | Avoid buying; strong selling pressure likely |
| 🟡 Caution | 2.4 | $665.9 | Reduce positions or hedge; watch for reversals |
| 🟢 Sweet Spot | 4.0 | $654.98 | Optimal buy zone with 53.0% success rate |
| 💎 Value | 5.7 | $643.38 | Attractive buy on pullback; strong bounce zone |
| 🔵 Deep Value | 10.7 | $609.27 | Potential reversal, but risky; confirm with catalysts |
| ⚠️ Extreme Value | 11.9 | $601.08 | Severe oversold; high crash risk—wait for catalyst |
| 🚨 Crash Zone | >30% | Below extreme | Critical danger zone—avoid unless deep value investor |
📈 Historical Performance at This Exact Distance: When INTU was specifically at 4.0% from its high (the sweet spot zone), it broke out to new all-time highs 53.0% of the time, with 30.0% crashing (−10%+). Historical sweet spot entries averaged 1.8:1 reward-to-risk (based on past breakouts from this zone).
Note: This measures outcomes at this specific distance. For broader success analysis across similar market contexts (not just distance), see Advanced Success Analysis below.
🎯 Advanced Success Analysis (RFC-011 Phase 2)
Scope Difference: Unlike the zone-specific breakout rate above (which only looks at exact distance from high), this analysis examines a BROADER set of similar market contexts—matching on trajectory, volume patterns, regime, and zone—not just distance. This explains why success rates may differ.
This analysis uses two methods to measure historical success when INTU was in similar price contexts:
📊 Binary Success (Traditional Method)
– What it measures: Did the stock reach NEW all-time highs?
– Rate: 55.0%
– Limitation: All-or-nothing – ignores partial progress
📈 Graded Success (Enhanced Method)
– What it measures: Progress toward the next high, with partial credit:
– 🟢 100% = Made new high (full success)
– 🟡 85% = Reached 85% of the way to new high
– 🟡 75% = Reached 75% of the way
– 🟠 50% = Reached halfway point
– 🔴 25% = Made 25% progress
– ❌ 0% = No progress or declined
– Rate: 65.0%
– Advantage: Shows favorable risk/reward even with conservative targets
| Metric | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Binary Success | 55.0% | 486 samples – moderate confidence |
| Graded Success | 65.0% | 486 samples – moderate confidence |
| Improvement | +10.0 points | Graded method captures partial gains |
📊 Confidence Breakdown (41.0/100 – Low):
– Sample Size: 40/40 points – Based on 369.4 weighted samples
– Quality: 0.1/40 points – Average similarity and recency (0.6)
– Consistency: 0.8/20 points – Low variance = predictable outcomes
🔍 Sample Quality & Reliability:
– Total Samples: 486 similar historical contexts
– Effective Samples: 369.4 (weighted by recency)
– Recent Data: 80.7% from last 3 years
– Raw Rate: 61.2% (before adjustments)
– Cap Applied: Yes (55.0% max prevents overconfidence)
📊 What This Means: The graded success rate of 65.0% vs binary 55.0% (improvement: +10.0pp) shows that even when $INTU doesn’t make new highs, it often makes significant partial progress (50-85% of the way), indicating favorable risk/reward even with conservative price targets.
💰 Price Targets and Risk Management
These price levels translate the percentage zones into actionable dollar amounts, with stop-loss suggestions based on INTU’s daily volatility (ATR).
| Target Type | Price Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Optimal Buy | $654.98 | Enter in sweet spot for best risk/reward. |
| 🟢 Good Value | $643.38 | Strong buy opportunity on deeper pullback. |
| 🟢 Deep Value | $609.27 | Oversold; wait for reversal signals (e.g., high volume, news). |
| 🔴 Reduce Position | $665.9 | In caution zone—scale back exposure. |
| 🔴 Exit/Hedge | $675.45 | Near resistance—consider selling or hedging. |
| 🚀 Breakout Confirmation | $689.09 | 1% above high—signals new uptrend. |
| 🚀 Strong Breakout | $702.74 | 3% above high—confirms bullish momentum. |
| 📊 Position Sizing | 10-25% (Value zone) (Current price) | Low confidence due to VALUE_ZONE. |
Note: Stop-loss levels are shown within each trading scenario below, tailored to the specific entry strategy (value entries use wider ATR-based stops; breakout entries use tighter setup-specific stops below breakout level).
⚖️ Risk/Reward Methodology (RFC-008 Phase 5)
Transparent breakdown of risk/reward calculation using current price, target price projection, and volatility-adjusted stop loss.
Risk/Reward Analysis
🟠 Quality Assessment: Marginal (1.14:1)
| Component | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Entry Price | $647.68 | Current market price for INTU |
| Target Price | $702.74 | Projected resistance or breakout level |
| Stop Loss | $599.23 | Risk management exit point |
| Potential Reward | $55.06 | Target – Entry |
| Potential Risk | $48.45 | Entry – Stop |
| R/R Ratio | 1.14:1 | Reward divided by Risk |
Calculation Breakdown
Formula: (Target - Entry) / (Entry - Stop)
Step-by-step:
1. Reward = $702.74 (target) – $647.68 (entry) = $55.06
2. Risk = $647.68 (entry) – $599.23 (stop) = $48.45
3. Ratio = $55.06 / $48.45 = 1.14:1
Stop Loss Determination: Current – (2 × ATR) = $647.68 – $48.45
14-Day ATR: $19.89 (~3.1% of entry price) – stop is 2.4x ATR for volatility adjustment
💡 Interpretation
A ratio between 1.0-1.5:1 is marginal – reward barely exceeds risk. Consider waiting for better setup or wider targets.
Position Sizing Guidance: With a 1.14:1 R/R ratio, if you risk 1% of portfolio capital, you target 1.14% potential gain. Adjust position size so that hitting the stop loss = acceptable portfolio loss (typically 0.5-2% per trade).
Important: This R/R calculation assumes execution at entry price and hitting either target or stop. Actual results may vary with slippage, partial exits, or trailing stops.
🎯 Current Analysis
Current Position: INTU is in the VALUE_ZONE at $647.68, 5.1% below its high
📋 Recommendation: BUY_WITH_WIDE_STOP
💡 Explanation: Price in VALUE_ZONE with favorable historical performance (55% breakout rate). Based on consolidating entry pattern.
🔍 Confidence: LOW
📈 Historical Success: 0.65
⚖️ Risk/Reward: 1.14
📋 Trading Scenarios
Based on current price position and technical setup, here are actionable trade scenarios with defined entries, targets, and stops:
🚀 Scenario B: Breakout Entry (Momentum)
Best for: Momentum traders wanting confirmation before entry
Entry Conditions:
– Price breaks above $689.09 (1% above high)
– Volume expands (>1.5x average) on breakout day
– Price holds above breakout level for 2+ hours (avoid false breakout)
– Verify OBV rises with breakout
Position Setup:
– Entry: $689.09 (on confirmation) or first pullback to $685.64
– Initial Target: $702.74 (strong breakout – take 50% profit)
– Extended Target: $737.88 (momentum continuation – let 50% run)
– Stop Loss: $668.42 (3% below breakout entry)
– Why this stop? Breakout entries require tight stops at invalidation point; if price falls below breakout level, setup failed and we exit immediately
– Position Size: 50-75% (momentum play with confirmation)
Risk/Reward: ~0.7:1 to initial target
Why This Works:
– Breakout confirms new uptrend beginning
– Volume expansion validates institutional participation
– Clear invalidation point (breakdown below breakout)
⚡ Scenario C: Current Price Entry (SUBOPTIMAL)
Best for: Traders who must enter now or want to start scaling in
Entry Conditions:
– Current Price: $647.68
– ✅ In value zone – reasonable entry
– ⚠️ Wait for volume confirmation
Position Setup:
– Entry: $647.68 (current market)
– Initial Target: $689.09 (breakout confirmation level)
– Extended Target: $702.74 (strong breakout level)
– Stop Loss: $599.23 (normal ATR-based stop)
– Why normal stop? Entry at current price uses standard ATR protection; balances risk management with avoiding premature stop-outs from normal volatility
– Alternative: $619.99 (tight stop for aggressive traders)
– Position Size: 25-50% (scale in if possible)
Risk/Reward: ~0.8:1 with normal stop
Why This is SUBOPTIMAL:
– Entry between zones – better prices available
– Consider scaling: 30% now, add 40% at $654.98, final 30% at $643.38
– Scaling in reduces average cost and risk
📊 Comprehensive Volume Analysis
Volume analysis provides institutional-level insights into supply and demand dynamics. This advanced analysis combines multiple volume indicators to identify accumulation, distribution, and potential divergences.
On-Balance Volume (OBV) – Cumulative Volume Pressure
📉 Current Trend: Down
10-Day Net Change: -3,810,443
Interpretation: Bearish – OBV declining over 10 days (-3,810,443)
OBV tracks cumulative buying and selling pressure. Rising OBV with price suggests healthy accumulation; falling OBV with rising price may indicate distribution (bearish divergence).
VWAP Multi-Timeframe Confluence
🟡 Confluence Signal: Mixed Signals
| Timeframe | Signal | Weight | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Day | Neutral | High | Immediate institutional positioning |
| 14-Day | Neutral | Medium | Swing accumulation/distribution |
| 30-Day | Neutral | Medium | Trend-level volume commitment |
VWAP (Volume-Weighted Average Price) represents the average price paid by institutions. Price above VWAP with accumulation suggests bullish control; below VWAP with distribution indicates bearish pressure.
Volume Activity Metrics
➡️ Relative Volume: 0.94x
vs. 20-Day Average: -6.0%
Recent Volume Spikes: 0 in last 30 days
Quality Ratio: 0.99 (Neutral)
💡 Volume Integration with Price Zones
Combining volume analysis with price-based zones enhances decision accuracy:
– Near Resistance + Distribution: High risk—institutions may be selling into strength
– Value Zone + Accumulation: Strong buy signal—institutions building positions
– Breakout + High Volume: Confirms new trend—likely to sustain
– Price Divergence + Volume Divergence: Critical warning—potential reversal imminent
Use volume to validate price zone recommendations and improve entry/exit timing.
📊 Moving Average Cluster Analysis
Current MA Positioning
| MA Period | Price | Distance | Slope | Direction | Support Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMA10 | $643.06 | -0.7% | -1.37% | 📉 Falling | – |
| SMA20 | $648.18 | +0.1% | -1.06% | 📉 Falling | – |
| SMA50 | $661.30 | +2.1% | -0.75% | 📉 Falling | – |
| SMA200 | $675.19 | +4.2% | +0.20% | ➡️ Flat | – |
🎯 Detected MA Clusters
VERY_STRONG Cluster Detected:
– SMA10 + SMA20 + SMA50 converging at $650.85 (0.5% above current price)
– 3 moving averages within 3% range
– Cluster strength: VERY_STRONG
– Interpretation: Price currently testing cluster resistance. Potential pullback zone if rejected.
💡 Trading Recommendation
Action: No Clear Target
Confidence: N/A
Primary Entry: $0.00
Entry Strategy:
No strategy provided
Confirmation Signals:
– Decreasing volume on pullback
– Bullish reversal candlestick at support level
– RSI oversold condition (<40)
– Higher volume on bounce
🔄 Peer Momentum Comparison (RFC-008)
Understanding relative performance vs. sector peers clarifies whether price movement is company-specific or sector-wide.
Peers Analyzed: 5 (LLM-discovered, programmatically validated)
Target vs. Sector Performance
| Metric | INTU | Sector Avg | Relative | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Change | +2.95% | +0.82% | +2.13pp | 📈 Outperforming |
| 10-Day Change | -0.45% | -1.04% | +0.59pp | 📈 Outperforming |
Peer Momentum Breakdown
| Ticker | 5-Day | 10-Day |
|---|---|---|
| ORCL | +5.43% | -5.79% |
| SAP | +2.51% | +2.45% |
| ADBE | +2.26% | +0.71% |
| CRM | +1.96% | +2.24% |
| WDAY | -8.07% | -4.79% |
💡 Interpretation
✅ Company-specific strength: INTU is outpacing peers, suggesting idiosyncratic positive factors beyond sector trends.
Discovery Method: LLM-driven peer identification with programmatic validation (sector match, market cap band 0.25x-4x).
The peer companies were selected based on their similar business models to Intuit Inc., which includes providing software and services for businesses and consumers, with a focus on financial management and compliance products. The companies also have similar revenue mix and factor exposures.
💼 Investment Considerations
- 🏦 Long-Term Investors: Consider entry points near $643.38 (value zone) to $609.27 (deep value) with wide stops ($578.46) to manage downside. Current price at $647.68 is 5.1% below high. Monitor upcoming earnings or sector news for catalysts.
- ⚡ Short-Term Traders: Wait for a breakout above $689.09 or a confirmed bounce in the deep value zone. Track Software – Application sector trends.
- 🌍 Market Context: The neutral market supports potential upside, but INTU’s high relative volatility (68.0th percentile) suggests bigger swings—diversify and stay cautious.
🔬 Methodology
This analysis uses the Adaptive Peak Distance Analyzer, a proprietary tool that studies INTU’s historical price movements to identify optimal trading zones. It calculates:
– 📊 Price Zones: Based on distances from 52-week highs where INTU historically breaks out or reverses, using 1255 days of data (since ~2021).
– 📈 Volatility Adjustment: Compares INTU’s 30-day volatility (33.9%) to SPY’s historical distribution, ranking at the 68.0th percentile, no major zone adjustments.
– ⏰ Time Decay: Weights recent price reversals (~3.4 years) more heavily (average weight: 0.11) to reflect current behavior.
– 🌍 Market Regime: Adjusts zones based on SPY’s position (1.8% vs. 50-day SMA), wider near-high zones.
– 📊 Volume Analysis: When available, integrates volume profile analysis including On-Balance Volume (OBV), Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP), and volume-price divergence patterns to validate price movements and identify institutional accumulation/distribution.
– 📏 Metrics: Daily Volatility (σ) 2.14% typical 1-day move. Uses 14-Day ATR for volatility-adjusted stop-losses (RFC-011). Historical sweet spot entries averaged 1.8:1 reward-to-risk; current R/R from today’s price shown in Risk/Reward section below.
The analysis is robust (1255 samples, “High (Robust dataset)” quality) but focuses on price patterns and volume trends, not fundamental analysis. For broader context, check financial news or analyst reports.
🏢 About Intuit Inc.
Sector: Technology | Industry: Software – Application
Intuit Inc. provides financial management and compliance products and services for consumers, small businesses, self-employed, and accounting professionals in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company operates in four segments: Small Business & Self-Employed, Consumer, Credit Karma, and ProConnect. The Small Business & Self-Employed segment provides QuickBooks online services and desktop software solutions comprising QuickBooks Online Advanced, a cloud-based solution; QuickBook…
⚠️ Disclaimer
This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investing in stocks like INTU involves risks, including loss of principal. The analysis relies on historical price data and may not predict future performance. Always conduct your own research, consider your financial situation, and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Report generated on December 03, 2025
